How you know the POWER CONTROL GROUP has their hooks into our President who needs all of our help

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/us/politics/21obama.html?_r=3&emc=eta1



Obama Is Said to Consider Preventive Detention Plan


By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

Published: May 20, 2009




WASHINGTON — President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a “preventive detention” system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said.



The discussion, in a 90-minute meeting in the Cabinet Room that included Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and other top administration officials, came on the eve of a much-anticipated speech Mr. Obama is to give Thursday on a number of thorny national security matters, including his promise to close the detention center at the naval base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.



Human rights advocates are growing deeply uneasy with Mr. Obama’s stance on these issues, especially his recent move to block the release of photographs showing abuse of detainees, and his announcement that he is willing to try terrorism suspects in military commissions — a concept he criticized bitterly as a presidential candidate.

The two participants, outsiders who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the session was intended to be off the record, said they left the meeting dismayed.

They said Mr. Obama told them he was thinking about “the long game” — how to establish a legal system that would endure for future presidents. He raised the issue of preventive detention himself, but made clear that he had not made a decision on it. Several senior White House officials did not respond to requests for comment on the outsiders’ accounts.

“He was almost ruminating over the need for statutory change to the laws so that we can deal with individuals who we can’t charge and detain,” one participant said. “We’ve known this is on the horizon for many years, but we were able to hold it off with George Bush. The idea that we might find ourselves fighting with the Obama administration over these powers is really stunning.”

The other participant said Mr. Obama did not seem to be thinking about preventive detention for terrorism suspects now held at Guantánamo Bay, but rather for those captured in the future, in settings other than a legitimate battlefield like Afghanistan. “The issue is,” the participant said, “What are the options left open to a future president?”

Mr. Obama did not specify how he intended to deal with Guantánamo detainees who posed a threat and could not be tried, nor did he share the contents of Thursday’s speech, the participants said.

He will deliver the speech at a site laden with symbolism — the National Archives, home to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Across town, his biggest Republican critic, former Vice President Dick Cheney, will deliver a speech at the American Enterprise Institute.

Mr. Cheney and other hawkish critics have sought to portray Mr. Obama as weak on terror, and their argument seems to be catching on with the public. On Tuesday, Senate Democrats, in a clear rebuke to the White House, blocked the $80 million Mr. Obama had requested in financing to close the Guantánamo prison.

The lawmakers say they want a detailed plan before releasing the money; there is deep opposition on Capitol Hill to housing terrorism suspects inside the United States.

“He needs to convince people that he’s got a game plan that will protect us as well as be fair to the detainees,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, who agrees with Mr. Obama that the prison should be closed. “If he can do that, then we’re back on track. But if he doesn’t make that case, then we’ve lost control of this debate.”

But Mr. Obama will not use the speech to provide the details lawmakers want.

“What it’s not going to be is a prescriptive speech,” said David Axelrod, Mr. Obama’s senior adviser. “The president wants to take some time and put this whole issue in perspective to identify what the challenges are and how he will approach dealing with them.”


________________________________




tommy:





IF MR OBAMA wants to know "what the challenges are" and "how to deal with them"...I suggest Mr Obama do the following:





1) EXTORT THOSE WHO HAVE EXTORTED YOU. It is treason to extort the President. Obama would make a great witness...doncha think?


2) ATTACK, ATTACK, AND ATTACK some more, by...getting the facts out with subpoenaed testimony.


A DOJ COMPLAINANT (THOMAS S. BEAN) WHO COOPERATED TO STOP FALSE FLAG AT OK CITY...was tortured, chipped, mind controlled, and fried with a directed energy weapon after he signed and sent a 47 page US DOJ OIG--FBI OPR COMPLAINT that was obstructed.


On SATURDAY, APRIL 11TH, 2009, (at VONS SUPERMARKET PARKING LOT IN BOULDER CITY, NEVADA, at 9:00 pm) I was once again TORTURED AND FRIED WITH A DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON POINTED AT MY TRUCK WHERE I WAS ASLEEP IN THE BACK. I was forced to live out of my vehicle, after being tortured in my home (Sioux Falls, SD).


I got tortured with "enhanced interrogation techniques" to PREVENT THE FILING OF SECTION 1983 LAWSUIT with a MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (to get the chip removed from my skull...a course of medical care is a due process liberty issue that was unilaterally violated by CHENEY--GOSS--MUELLER standing down?).

ANY outrageous violation of CIVIL LIBERTIES UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY OR A CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE ANY CIVIL LIBERTY is a violation of TITLE 18 USC SECTIONS 241, 242.

What is HOLDER holding up?

HOLDER is the acting US ATTORNEY GENERAL, and...OBAMA needs everyone's help to get the Cheney 3,000 pound gorilla (right wing false flag police state) back in it's cage.





3) "STATE SECRETS" was USED TO STOP SOUTH DAKOTA HIGHWAY PATROL CAPTAIN JEFF TALBOT'S preliminary inquiry into the Murder of Talbot's friend, YPD SGT MARK DEFENBAUGH. I know. I called Talbot on my wiretapped phone.

I also know that TALBOT mysteriously resigned 60 days later in disgust and frustration.




I talked to both DEFENBAUGH AND KABIESEMAN before their suspicious, untimely deaths. The surveillance has tapes and knowledge of all my known associations.

More people linked to me, my association, and my info...ended up dead, or maimed.

I have never seen this many known associates all end up dead, hospitalized, or maimed?

Very powerful info...and a very secret President Cheney linked to Executive Office Death Squads...all hidden behind corporate fronts?...using NSA 902ND COUNTERINTEL GROUP'S SIGINT to facilitate the neutralizations?...doncha know?




4) TAKE CONTROL OF DOJ.


If someone picked your cabinet for you, then...uh...you got to extort the power control group.

Easy...ya know...you are a very likeable and reliable witness to being extorted with the birth certificate issue that always appears on the US SUPREME COURT docket...then goes away?

We need final resolution...or better yet...a CHENEY TRICK: PASS A NEW LAW requiring final resolution of the issue within a hundred days of Barack's inaugaration. Since their was no "final resolution of the birth certificate issue-citizenship" within a reasonable amount of time, then...uh...you would have final resolution.

The Dems will have to live in reality, and fight together, and that...seems...to be almost impossible for REID, and Nancy "there will be no Impeachment" Pelosi.

If you don't fight together, you will all lose together individually.

You don't cut deals with the devil...and not live to regret those assumptions. I think Reid and Pelosi "sold out a long time ago" don't you think?




5) NOTICE THAT HOLDER did not protect OBAMA from the extortionists jerking his chain with the birth certificate issue?

This issue is on the US SUP CT docket again?

HOLDER can subpoena witnesses to the extortion, with Barack as the key pivot...and...EXTORTION OF THE PRESIDENT IS TREASON...no?


WE NEED FINAL ADJUDICATION ON THE citizenship issue, with BARACK TESTIFYING LATER IF HE LOSES THE PRESIDENCY (which I do not think THE US SUP CT would do).

I'm also wondering if...JUSTICE SOUTER has something to say about "how he was forced out" with dirt on him, and how that dirt was obtained (OPER SLAMMER-Mind Control?).


HOLDER should have a "contingent threat made known" that "if Obama loses the Presidency in that corrupt SCOTUS, then...EXTORTION AND TREASON WILL BE CHARGED WITH BARACK as the key witness. CONSPIRACY is also a crime.

Barack needs to "rattle their cage" to get them on tape...as evidence...then release that evidence so that...the internet court of common pleas can carry the news to the people.

Right now, Barack is not Barack.

Obviously compromised by Cheney's power control group (MUELLER, CLINTON, PANETTA, EMMANUEL, GEITHNER, GATES, others).




HOLDER should have already made arrests and announced prosecutions.


THOMAS S. BEAN gets tortured and implanted with a mind control chip after an FBI INVESTIGATION WAS OVER WITH?...or did FBI DO A BOGUS ILLEGAL SUBLIMINAL COUNTERINTELIGENCE BRIEFING WITH A BOGUS FISA CT ORDER (that the presiding Judge has already claimed "will not be revealed"?).

LET'S look at that ex parte FISA CT order...because...BEAN IS NOT AN AGENT OF A FOREIGN POWER, and...FBI USES THE HAND OFF METHOD OF VIOLATING TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 2517 (prohibits the illegal dissemination of illegally obtained info in violation of Title III......aka "no warrant, cannot disseminate, use, testify about the info...").


LET'S see the warrant to "steal my x ray evidence" showing the chip, and lets analize the legal issue when "Police State actors with FBI badges" flipped my medical team (DRS CARDA, BURGER) into "falsely reporting medical test results" in successful attempt at "hindering the best interests of the patient" who was intentionally misinformed about a "course of medical care".


Let's look at the CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, especially when my SD BD OF MED AND OSTEOPATHIC EXAMINERS COMPLAINT was obstructed by...who? Subpoena SD AG DON SRSTKA who was brought in by LARRY LONG (prior bad actor who neutralized SD US ATTY MICHELLE TAPKEN'S FED GRAND JURY INDICTMENTS?) to "cover it all up under a secret unspoken assertion that 'state secrets' unilaterally obstructed any outside police investigation of my fact pattern.


Big story.

Big scandal.

Witnesses still alive.

No enterest from Holder?

Only way out for Obama.

Only way out for all of us...doncha know?




6) Make a deal with the military, and make sure COLIN POWELL is organizing the coup d'etat with promise of being SEC OF DEF, OR SEC OF STATE.

POWELL I can trust.

The Revolt of the generals...those generals can be trusted.


Obviously, MUELLER IS A KEY PLAYER, OR HE IS NOT ON THIS BUS.


One thing is for sure...we cannot afford to have CHENEY IN D.C., OR TO HAVE HIS POWER CONTROL GROUP IN THIS WHITE HOUSE, especially the wackos of Israel.



The military and FBI field agents....want to run BOTH CHENEY AND THE KIKES out of D.C.

Who would not want that after 9/11 was obviously an inside job with CHERTOFF AND MUKASY getting the Dancing Israelis out of jail after ABLE DANGER tipped off NYPD.


All you got to do is ask COLIN POWELL about "bringing in the military" to remove CHENEY and his punks.


If nothing else, RAHMBO (MOSSAD's man) has to go, and nobody in the Nat. Security state who is an American could or should oppose that.

Anybody opposing that, is to be declared an "enemy non combatant" likely to be chipped, mind controlled, and fried with a directed energy weapon (like me, and others...including former FBI agent and whistleblower GERAL SOSBEE...see his website).









BELIEVE ME, THE DOD AND JCS are ready to RUN THE KIKES OUT OF D.C. AND OUR NAT. SEC. STATE...TODAY.


BELIEVE ME, Obama needs some muscle...and most JCS and DOD are ready to help remove the problem using THE WAR COMMISSIONS ACT on the neocon power control group.

These are the only possible solutions and options.


_______________________________________


http://www.infowars.com/obama-signing-statement-weakens-whistle-blower-protections/


Obama signing statement weakens “whistle-blower” protections

WSWS

May 21, 2009




When he signed into law a $410 billion omnibus spending bill on March 10, President Barack Obama included a “signing statement” weakening a rider in the bill that would have given protection to government officials who turn over information to Congress.

As a candidate for the presidency, Obama campaigned in favor of broad protection for federal whistle-blowers and against the sort of presidential signing statements that, under the Bush administration, had eviscerated the intent of congressional legislation.

The traditional purpose of signing statements was largely symbolic or pertained to the practical implementation of new laws by federal employees. President Bush used this mechanism more than 1,200 times—a record by far—to interpret and substantially alter the intent of laws, effectively usurping power from both the legislative branch of the government, which the Constitution tasks with creating laws, and from the judicial, which is invested with the power to interpret laws.

Prior to the Reagan administration, all previous presidents used the signing statement only 75 times combined—mostly for celebratory purposes. The scope and scale of the practice accelerated rapidly under the Reagan administration, who issued 250 such statements. A young staff attorney in Reagan’s Office of Legal Counsel, Samuel Alito—now a US Supreme Court Justice—argued in 1986 that “interpretive signing statements” could be used to “increase the power of the Executive to shape the law.” The practice continued under George H.W. Bush (228 statements) Clinton (381 statements), and increased enormously under George W. Bush.




Obama’s signing statement on the omnibus spending bill suggests that he will carry on Bush’s policy, in spite of his campaign pledges to the contrary. In reference to the congressional rider, which had appeared on appropriations bills since the mid-1990s, Obama wrote, “I do not interpret this provision to detract from my authority to direct the heads of executive departments to supervise, control and correct employees’ communications with the Congress in cases where such communications would be unlawful or would reveal information that is properly privileged or otherwise confidential.”

The signing statement asserts broad executive privilege over the control of information. Its vague reference to Obama’s ability to “supervise, control and correct employees’ communications,” and to “information that is properly privileged” are clearly designed to have a chilling effect on any government employee that might step forward to expose the ways in which government appropriations are being used.

A top Republican lawmaker, Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, has drawn attention to the whistle-blower signing statement to embarrass Obama. Grassley cites specific Obama campaign promises, including his pledge to only “sign legislation in the light of day without attaching signing statements that undermine the legislative intent,” and that he would not “use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress.”

Yet Obama’s use of the signing statement to usurp powers of the legislative and judicial branches is only secondarily a partisan issue, as Bush’s rampant use of the stratagem shows. Rather, its use by recent administrations is bound up with the development of the “imperial presidency.”

________________



tommy:



Remember, this is not the Barack Obama we voted for.

He got reached, and we all need to come together to help him extort the extortionists.

If we don't...we are sunk.